Dawah team gives Christmas presents at Speaker’s Corner!
Can Muslim celebrate Christmas? Should they be giving presents to Christians?
“O People of the Scripture! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor utter aught concerning Allah save the truth. The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a messenger of Allah, and His word which He conveyed unto Mary, and a spirit from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers, and say not “Three” – Cease! (it is) better for you! – Allah is only One Allah. Far is it removed from His Transcendent Majesty that He should have a son. His is all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. And Allah is sufficient as Defender.” Sura 4:171
To support the work of DCCI https://paypal.me/supportDCCI
I know a non-observant Jew, named Goldberg, who celebrates Christmas. He does the secular and non controversial part. I am not sure what happens when Hanukkah and Christmas overlap but he puts up a Christmas Tree and decorates it. He exchanges presents. I am personally suspicious of Muslims giving Christmas gifts. Sura 3:28 is similar to Sura 5:61. I always suspect that it is a political propaganda device to convince the useful idiots that Islam is the religion of peace.
In the US we sometimes see, at this time of the year, joint services with Muslims and Christians reading from the Bible and the Qur’an sections that largely agree with each other about the birth of Jesus. They might use the word Jesus instead of Issa. To the fundamentalist Christian this is a sure sign of the rot inside of the Christian church because no Muslim could allow Jesus his rightful place in the Trinity and they do not believe He died for the sins of mankind. This is a political use of a Church which should not be allowed.
I am also mystified by the frequency that Kaffirs, besides Dr. James White, and others are welcomed into the Mosques. I thought Kafirs in the Mosque was haram. These people are going to Hell and this ecumenicalism just submits to Satan’s plan. Besides, this Muslin gives Hatun a present and then proceeds to play with it. There is a lesson in that.
“Danny Newton says: I know a non-observant Jew, named Goldberg, who celebrates Christmas. He does the secular and non controversial part. I am not sure what happens when Hanukkah and Christmas overlap but he puts up a Christmas Tree and decorates it. He exchanges presents.”
Secular people always have a clever way to depict Jesus as a guru secularism, he’s anti-law, anti-regulation, anti-prohibition, he is naturalist hippy, chewing weeds for new enlightenment, dancing with women and nature, rejecting religious controls and authorities, as long as it is fun it’s okay.
“I am personally suspicious of Muslims giving Christmas gifts. Sura 3:28 is similar to Sura 5:61. I always suspect that it is a political propaganda device to convince the useful idiots that Islam is the religion of peace.
In the US we sometimes see, at this time of the year, joint services with Muslims and Christians reading from the Bible and the Qur’an sections that largely agree with each other about the birth of Jesus. They might use the word Jesus instead of Issa. ”
If there’s a Moslem giving a Christmas gift to Christians, it means he wants them to consider our Islamic Isa as the better substitution of Jesus.
If there’s a Christian giving a Christmas gift to Moslems, it means he concurs with them that Isa is the true Jesus.
“To the fundamentalist Christian this is a sure sign of the rot inside of the Christian church because no Muslim could allow Jesus his rightful place in the Trinity and they do not believe He died for the sins of mankind. This is a political use of a Church which should not be allowed.”
We never say a bad thing of Jesus because he is our Prophet.
“I am also mystified by the frequency that Kaffirs, besides Dr. James White, and others are welcomed into the Mosques. I thought Kafirs in the Mosque was haram. These people are going to Hell and this ecumenicalism just submits to Satan’s plan.”
Anti-Islamophobia forces are our valuable Islamic allies, they are welcome in mosques for showing a humility.
“Besides, this Muslin gives Hatun a present and then proceeds to play with it. There is a lesson in that.”
It is possible for Hatun or her family, or friends, or maybe her descendants later to convert to Islam.
I admit it. I am afraid of Islamic political(sharia) and religions concepts degrading the Western culture. If that makes me an Islamophobe, so be it. Leftist have been characterizing their opponents as being in the grips of phobias for decades. They do it to support Homosexuality and gay marriage. They claim that we have a phobia of strangers if we question the wisdom of open borders. These “phobias” however do not show up in scientific literature such as the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness.” They are political constructs and have a political purpose. There are, therefore two areas of concern. The first is the way it threatens to change the culture for the worst and the second is the unlimited ability to send Muslims to Hell. I know that Islam is false because it does not result in peace with God. You never know for sure where you stand and you are always on a treadmill of good deeds and religious obligations to feel like you might make it out of Hell. Christianity can give you that peace by taking the burden of your sins off of your shoulders. Muslins always seem to be playing a ball game where only Allah knows the score.
“Danny Newton says: I admit it. I am afraid of Islamic political(sharia) and religions concepts degrading the Western culture. If that makes me an Islamophobe, so be it.”
I think you need a shrink, a therapist, do some therapy sessions.
You cannot differentiate Islam from Moslems, can you?
Islam is harmless.
“Leftist have been characterizing their opponents as being in the grips of phobias for decades. They do it to support Homosexuality and gay marriage. They claim that we have a phobia of strangers if we question the wisdom of open borders.”
Wait, wait, slow down.
This is getting sick and sicker. That’s weird, Don’t you think you sound a little bit weird? Homosexuality is different from the immigrants. You seem to mix everything here. Jefferson and Washington were immigrants, not homos, okay?
“These “phobias” however do not show up in scientific literature such as the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness.” They are political constructs and have a political purpose.”
Yeah, by its very definition, it is a mental illness and insane to have a stupid fear of an inanimate thing such as religion.
And you know what? It is a big deal for your mental health if you cannot differentiate Islam from the radical Moslems.
“There are, therefore two areas of concern. The first is the way it threatens to change the culture for the worst and the second is the unlimited ability to send Muslims to Hell. I know that Islam is false because it does not result in peace with God. You never know for sure where you stand and you are always on a treadmill of good deeds and religious obligations to feel like you might make it out of Hell. Christianity can give you that peace by taking the burden of your sins off of your shoulders. Muslins always seem to be playing a ball game where only Allah knows the score.”
Calm down, will you? This is weird. How could Islam harm you? How on earth could Islam hurt you? Islam is just a religion, be reasonable please.
One of the worst thing that the West ever adopted was psychology as a science. Try to imagine any other science where experimentation would be so difficult both morally and financially. A true scientist would prove the theory that children are damaged by child abuse would take a hundred children and abuse them and take another hundred children and not abuse them. The scientist would then follow up years later to see if the theory was right. Such experiments are not allowed so the theory remains being relied upon because if can not be falsified. Such an experiment, however has been done to Jews by Hitler. There was no proof that the survivors of the Holocaust became significantly worst citizens in the post war period.
Psychologist are infamous for their failures to prevent drug abuse. They think it is a victory when a client fails only three times to get off of drugs. The theories of psychology are just fanciful analogies to dysfunctional family life such as difficulty between parents and a child or caused by unfulfilled sexual desires. Worst yet, psychology concentrates most of its efforts on making the person feel better about himself. This over-involvement with the self is the work of the Devil. The Bible advises us to be concerned for the welfare of others more than your own welfare.( Philippians 2:3 Let nothing be done through selfish ambition or conceit, but in lowliness of mind let each esteem others better than himself.) I am not denying that there is such a thing as mental illness. I don’t deny that there is chemical intervention that can help those people but psychology’s premier achievement is in the area of business and tempting people to buy things that they never knew they needed.
How can Muslims hurt me, even the peaceful ones? The peaceful and observant ones are paying the Zakat and part of that goes to Jihad in foreign lands. Look up:” Holy Lands Foundation, Convictions.”
“Danny Newton says: How can Muslims hurt me, even the peaceful ones? The peaceful and observant ones are paying the Zakat and part of that goes to Jihad in foreign lands. Look up:” Holy Lands Foundation, Convictions.” ”
Had you ever participated in invading Palestine?
According to the US courts, HLF was found guilty of deliberately killing our Moslem children and Palestinian youths by letting them to be suicide bombers. It was over. If HLF had produced the Stingers to expel Israeli military, not to kill the Palestinian children by suicide, Americans would have given it a medal of honor.
Don’t they name streets after suicide bombers in Israel and aren’t the families given compensation for their sacrifice? Are the Jews lying about teaching hatred for the Jews in Palestinian schools? Or is that just another lie propagated by the ubiquitous and evil Jew? If the Jews really ran the world, I would expect it to be a slightly better place.
[email protected]
says:
12 December 2018 at 6:59 am
“Danny Newton says: I admit it. I am afraid of Islamic political(sharia) and religions concepts degrading the Western culture. If that makes me an Islamophobe, so be it.”
[email protected]:I think you need a shrink, a therapist, do some therapy sessions.
You cannot differentiate Islam from Moslems, can you?
Islam is harmless.
D. Newton:“Leftist have been characterizing their opponents as being in the grips of phobias for decades. They do it to support Homosexuality and gay marriage. They claim that we have a phobia of strangers if we question the wisdom of open borders.”
[email protected]: Wait, wait, slow down.
This is getting sick and sicker. That’s weird, Don’t you think you sound a little bit weird? Homosexuality is different from the immigrants. You seem to mix everything here. Jefferson and Washington were immigrants, not homos, okay?
D. Newton:Jefferson and Washington were heterosexual and they were men who had suspicion of a government that was too closely allied to religion. In the background of the American revolution was a sad tendency to fight over the religion of the King or Queen and the influence of the Pope over the matters of state. At the earliest times in the history of the American government, the grip of the Church of England was broken by forbidding mandatory collection of money for the use by the church. Most people do not know that one of the early volunteer jobs that Washington had was collecting those payments from the members of his church. This shows a great deal of changed thinking on the part of George Washington about a church involved in secular matters.
[email protected]: Yeah, by its very definition, it is a mental illness and insane to have a stupid fear of an inanimate thing such as religion.
And you know what? It is a big deal for your mental health if you cannot differentiate Islam from the radical Moslems.
D. Newton: Islam will become inanimate when it stops killing kafirs, apostates and the innocent. Islam will become inanimate when it stops collecting Zakat to do Jihad in foreign nations. Islam will become inanimate when it no longer seeks Sharia. The radical Muslim is the real Muslim who takes the Qur’an seriously and literally.
[email protected]: Calm down, will you? This is weird. How could Islam harm you? How on earth could Islam hurt you? Islam is just a religion, be reasonable please.
D. Newton: Islam is more likely to hurt you than it is to hurt me. Does your Imam know that you think that Islam is “just a religion?” To me, religions can be dangerous. We have already had our Catholic vs. Protestant wars in Europe and the Americas. How will you avoid your Shia vs Sunni wars of the future? Thanks to the heathen North Koreans, the Sunnis have their A-Bomb and the Shiits in Iran are quickly developing one and may have one now. How long will it be before they bring on total nuclear war in the Middle East? Is the difference between the two sides inanimate?
This is so wrong. Just because a person knows one or couple things about Islam that doesn’t make him the expert of Islam. But that’s okay. People tend to judge something even before they know it.
It is incorrect to fear of Islam due to what the radicals have done. This is the way: firstly you hate radicals, then you hate Arabs, then you hate Islam, finally you hate all Moderate Moslems generally.
I am a Christian and therefore must love Arabs because we are all descendants of Adam. Race is a cultural or social construct. I must also be concerned for their souls and the fact that they are entrapped in a political and religious system that assures friction with any culture they enter. There is an old proverb, possibly Persian: Me against my brother, me and my brother against my cousin, me my brother and my cousin against the stranger. This perfectly describes friction between tribes and factions in the Middle East and it is being imported into the West. I don’t think it is an exaggeration to point to the separation of Pakistan from India as a warning that Muslims and non-Muslims just don’t mix very well. I don’t claim to be an expert in Islam. There are legitimate instances where phobias cause people to take excessive or counter productive actions to cope with life. Islamophobia is not a real phobia. The magicians of the Left have spoken islamophobia into existence by constantly claiming it to be real. The constant and annoying drone about overreacting to peaceful Muslims still ignores the Zakat problem and the fact that a portion of it goes to Jihad.
“Danny Newton says: I am a Christian and therefore must love Arabs because we are all descendants of Adam.”
We Moslems have the potent Litmus Test for that “subjective claim” of Non-Moslems: do you love our Prophet Muhammad?
Yes or No. That’s all.
“Race is a cultural or social construct.”
We also have another Litmus Test for that claim: Is an Arab allowed to graft his “positive” (non-penal) Shari’ah Laws, into and under, your Secular Constitution without infringing both his and your rights?
“I must also be concerned for their souls and the fact that they are entrapped in a political and religious system that assures friction with any culture they enter.”
Are you really sure about that, or perhaps it is just an empty lips-service?
We also have a very very special Litmus Test for that claim: Do you hate Islam, or Moderate Moslems, or radicals? or all of them in one?
“There is an old proverb, possibly Persian: Me against my brother, me and my brother against my cousin, me my brother and my cousin against the stranger.”
What is a “good” contribution that may come from, by, for the ancient Persian culture during the prolonging time of Persian kingdom in the past? maybe Harem? Invention of a mat? Sorry I hardly know it.
“This perfectly describes friction between tribes and factions in the Middle East and it is being imported into the West.”
They come to the West actually to “beg” the West to teach them “once more time, again” a value of diversity after a historical success of thel Western imposition of Sykes-Picot lines in Middle East, even till now.
“I don’t think it is an exaggeration to point to the separation of Pakistan from India as a warning that Muslims and non-Muslims just don’t mix very well.”
Mostly the border of nations was made by the West.
They both respect what the West does, choose, and imposes to them. Why? Because the West is an ongoing symbol of tolerance.
“I don’t claim to be an expert in Islam.”
Good.
Usually, the honest non-experts avoid a subjective judgment, bias of prejudice, and agenda of bigotry.
Are you still judging Islam?
“There are legitimate instances where phobias cause people to take excessive or counter productive actions to cope with life.”
The acute phobia tends to proceed to be a mental illness.
“Islamophobia is not a real phobia.”
Islamophobes are crazy.
They claim to love Arabs, but hate the most genuine Arab person our Prophet Muhammad.
They claim to not have a fear of Islam, but they do fear the establishment of Shari’ah law.
They claim to hate Wahhabis, but they agree with the selling of American weapons to Wahhabis.
“The magicians of the Left have spoken islamophobia into existence by constantly claiming it to be real.”
Liberals are pro-globalism.
Liberals have carefully studied and learned a lot how both Soviet and China succumbed to globalism. Globalism is intended by the Liberals to “reform” Arabs firstly. It’s “Arab Spring”. But, when the same globalism hits back the West with the global immigration, the Right-Wing bigots cry foul. This is Double Standard.
“The constant and annoying drone about overreacting to peaceful Muslims still ignores the Zakat problem and the fact that a portion of it goes to Jihad.”
C’mon. Jihad’s Stingers were used effectively to defeat the Soviets in Afghanistan, it is a fact how the US was a “Jihadist state” along with Saudi and Israel.
Israelis, Saudis and Americans sing Kumbaya altogether with Mujahidins.
Jihad was a good legitimate business during the Cold War.
[email protected]
I see that you are still ignoring my observation that the “peaceful” and observant Muslim still participates in death and chaos through the Zakat system. The government supervision of church finances is much more stringent in England than it is in the US. but the ability of the Muslim to skirt the rules that goes contrary to their proclivities is well known to us through the activities of the Holy Land Foundation. I have been told that near relatives of a suicide bomber or Jihadi have been promised a free pass into Paradise. Since I will not live long enough to become an expert in Islam, please save me some time and either verify or deny that.
“Danny Newton says: I see that you are still ignoring my observation that the “peaceful” and observant Muslim still participates in death and chaos through the Zakat system.”
In Cold War the Stingers caused the Soviets’ deaths, not Mujahiddin’s death.
The money goes legitimately to reduce the evil invaders.
“The government supervision of church finances is much more stringent in England than it is in the US. but the ability of the Muslim to skirt the rules that goes contrary to their proclivities is well known to us through the activities of the Holy Land Foundation.”
I think it is an Arab-Lobby group from the Cold War?
The US (and Israel) is more than enough for the undeniable example how “Jihad” was once a legit, lucrative, and good business in the infidel’s states in Cold War.
You can’t undo the History.
“I have been told that near relatives of a suicide bomber or Jihadi have been promised a free pass into Paradise. Since I will not live long enough to become an expert in Islam, please save me some time and either verify or deny that.”
The US and Israel say amen, amen to that during the Cold War.
[email protected]:
You are still dodging my question: How can a Muslim be “peaceful” and know that the Zakat is partially going to support foreign wars or foreign Jihad? If a person belongs to the Ku Klux Klan and just 5% of his membership dues goes to burning crosses on the lawns of Black folks, (domestic terrorism) which person would be the most noble, the “peaceful Muslim or the KKK member?
“Danny Newton says: You are still dodging my question: How can a Muslim be “peaceful” and know that the Zakat is partially going to support foreign wars or foreign Jihad?”
If the portion of Zakat goes to liberate Moslems from the invaders (not from civilians), it is for a legitimate Jihad, such as American-made Stingers for Mujahidins.
But if it is for killing the innocent Moslems and innocent children, it is not a Jihad but a crime.
“If a person belongs to the Ku Klux Klan and just 5% of his membership dues goes to burning crosses on the lawns of Black folks, (domestic terrorism) which person would be the most noble, the “peaceful Muslim or the KKK member?”
KKK doesn’t liberate Americans from Zionists or Soviets.
Narrated Al-Miqdam bin Ma’diykarib:
That the Messenger of Allah (?) said: “There are six things with Allah for the martyr. He is forgiven with the first flow of blood (he suffers), he is shown his place in Paradise, he is protected from punishment in the grave, secured from the greatest terror, the crown of dignity is placed upon his head – and its gems are better than the world and what is in it – he is married to seventy two wives along Al-Huril-‘Ayn of Paradise, and he may intercede for seventy of his close relatives.”
[Abu ‘Eisa said:] This Hadith is Hasan Sahih. Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1663
I think your prophet was a reformer who learned to hate the Arab culture during the Time of Ignorance. Perhaps his travels while being employed by his wife, Kadijah, opened his horizons and when he compared the people from where he came from to the cultures surrounding Arabia, he was ashamed and determined to change them. It is very much to his credit that he criticized people for preferring boys to girls and they killed girls by burying them. He managed to get people to reform marriage so at least they had a fairly good idea who their father was. It is also a great reform that he could get people to reduce the size of their harems. I can’t prove it because the ahadith don’t have date stamps on them, but Muhammed , via Abu Bakr, put an end to polytheist and others doing tawaf naked. No one in 2019 will be satisfied with what was accomplished by Muhammed but considering what he had to work with, there seems to be some amazing progress in a very short time. I am not convinced that he was in favor of beating females but the practice was probably so pervasive, he can at least take some credit for making the lives of women better. At least beat them lightly and don’t strike them on the face.(at-Tirmidhi, 276 & 267) Muhammed accomplished all of this by making real the personality of Allah. The only problem is nobody really knows who Allah really is. Is he the god who decides your fate 120 days after you are conceived or is he the god who can be bribed with good deeds, perfect supplication and timely prayer? Muhammed took advantage of the natural fear of Allah and convinced them that the probability of going to Paradise was much better than one in a thousand. He made it easy to go the Paradise if you conformed to his vision of a better Arabia and a better world. Even though Muhammed said there were forty ways to Paradise, there are many more than forty and he was a master of playing the good cop while Allah played the bad cop. While claiming that the People of the book had corrupted scriptures, he became the Corrupter in Chief of the Qur’an. I wonder if his warning not to say evil things of the dead prevented hadith collectors from getting a more accurate biography.
Islam is a New Religion with so many unique features that are not available in other older religions.
Some new things in Islam:
-women-based unity (Ummah),
-women’s right of divorcement,
-women’s portion of inheritance,
-women’s Age of puberty and consent before marriage,
-women’s dowry,
-women’s platonic marriage and betrothal,
-women’s Imam for other women,
-women’s judicial authority,
-women’s waiting time (Iddah).
New things in Islam with a dismissal of older ones:
– Islam has no priesthood, no Papacy, no caste, no monarchy.
– Islam has no racism.
– Islam has no original sin.
– Islam has no “elemental” fetishism, such as immolation penalty, burnt offerings, burning censers, sprinkling of bloods, anointment of altars and pillars, pole of bronze serpent, wandering scapegoat, booths for yoga-type meditation.
– Islam has no virginity test.
The Bible needs Islam in order to make Non-Moslems get and believe in the eternal happiness in Heavens. The Bible just promised a hellish celibacy in afterlife for them. Without Islam they will get and live in a painful celibacy, being less or more like Hell.
Worse, the depiction of afterlife which is promised for the Non-Moslems in the Bible contains a direct imagination of perversion and homophile : folks who will suck the kings’ breast.
Isa 60:16
Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of kings: and thou shalt know that I the LORD am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob.
[email protected]:
Worse, the depiction of afterlife which is promised for the Non-Moslems in the Bible contains a direct imagination of perversion and homophile : folks who will suck the kings’ breast.
Isa 60:16
Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of kings: and thou shalt know that I the LORD am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob.
Danny Newton: It might help you if you realize that about a third of the Bible is prophecy. When you see these passages, you should brace yourself for some flowery language and know that there are usually multiple conclusions available to the reader. The passage is a prophecy of the future state of
Israel. When it talks about sucking the milk of the Gentiles, it refers to taking tribute from Gentiles. Think of it as a Jizya going the wrong direction. The allusion to sucking the kings breast is describing tribute from neighboring governments. With only the first half of the sentence, one might imagine that the milk from the gentiles was taken by roving bands of caravan raiders. Adding the reference to the king, makes it known that the tribute is more global and legally binding on the king. I can find nowhere in the Bible where homosexuality would be an acceptable practice therefore it is better to think of whatever is going on as something other than that.
“Danny Newton says: One of the worst thing that the West ever adopted was psychology as a science.”
Psychology is meant just as a decent way to prevent one’s deteriorating psychics, not to heal him fully.
“Try to imagine any other science where experimentation would be so difficult both morally and financially.”
In a certain psychological level, religion is a good motivation.
“A true scientist would prove the theory that children are damaged by child abuse would take a hundred children and abuse them and take another hundred children and not abuse them.”
So scientist = abuser? You are wrong. In your example, the child abuse is a crime.
“The scientist would then follow up years later to see if the theory was right.”
Child molester is a scientist?
You give the Science a bad name.
“Such experiments are not allowed so the theory remains being relied upon because if can not be falsified.”
Theory can be rejected any time.
“Such an experiment, however has been done to Jews by Hitler.”
Do you imply here that Hitler was a shrink, a psychiatry? No.
“There was no proof that the survivors of the Holocaust became significantly worst citizens in the post war period.”
Is it really a theory? How childish.
“Psychologist are infamous for their failures to prevent drug abuse.”
At least, they reduce a drug addiction. They may not heal the addicts, but their addiction plunges down.
“They think it is a victory when a client fails only three times to get off of drugs.”
Those addicts are supposed to be killed shortly in DOD (Drug Overdose).
“The theories of psychology are just fanciful analogies to dysfunctional family life such as difficulty between parents and a child or caused by unfulfilled sexual desires.”
On the “worse sexual crime”, usually the Psychologists just hope to reduce a victim’s tendency to rape, harm, hurt, and commit suicide.
Shrinks don’t expect so highly to make those sexual victims get healed fully. Psychologists act like the hidden-believers of God’s predestination.
“Worst yet, psychology concentrates most of its efforts on making the person feel better about himself.”
That’s good. What’s wrong with that?
Shrinks just hoped a lot that the worst thing is delayed over and over again.
They are not hopeless.
“This over-involvement with the self is the work of the Devil.”
But Devil also works for a self hating, to make the victims commit suicide.
“The Bible advises us to be concerned for the welfare of others more than your own welfare.”
That’s nonsense when you have your starved kid in famine, or your beloved one in the wars.
“( Philippians 2:3 Let nothing be done through selfish ambition or conceit, but in lowliness of mind let each esteem others better than himself.)”
Just in theory.
In wars or famine, the statement above is nonsense.
“I am not denying that there is such a thing as mental illness.”
Such as Islamophobia.
What motivates us Moslems to be peaceful is the same Qur’an, same Prophet Muhammad, same Shari’ah law which also motivated the radicals in a wrong way. But in Islamophobes’ sick conclusion: we Moderate Moslems are non-existent.
“I don’t deny that there is chemical intervention that can help those people but psychology’s premier achievement is in the area of business and tempting people to buy things that they never knew they needed.”
We all reject lasciviousness of power, wealth and carnal desire, but how about a human’s dark side of terminating their own life thru victimisation, drugs, and self-hating by certain tragedy in the past? That needs a shrink’s help.
[email protected]
says:
14 December 2018 at 4:18 pm
“Danny Newton says: One of the worst thing that the West ever adopted was psychology as a science.”
[email protected] : Psychology is meant just as a decent way to prevent one’s deteriorating psychics, not to heal him fully.
[email protected]: In a certain psychological level, religion is a good motivation.
D. Newton: The path to Hell is paved with good intentions(motivations). The problem is that men are not all knowing and can not predict the consequences of our “good” intentions.
[email protected]: We all reject lasciviousness of power, wealth and carnal desire, but how about a human’s dark side of terminating their own life thru victimization, drugs, and self-hating by certain tragedy in the past? That needs a shrink’s help
D.Newton: A Shrink can not connect the sinner to the God so that the sinner receives peace with God. The Shrink can not forgive a sin because the sin was not committed against the shrink.