Use the Interactive App

For the full interactive experience with comments, bookmarks, and more features, open this article in our app:

Open in App

Daniel Haqiqatjou & Paul Williams Twist the Bible to Escape the Islamic Dilemma

daniel haqiqatjoupaul williamsblogging theologydavid woodanthony rogersislamic dilemmachristian vs muslim debateislam vs christianityacts 17 apologeticsdebate reviewmuslim apologistchristian apologistquran and biblebible preservationislam critiqueblogging theology reactiondavid wood vs daniel haqiqatjouislamic apologeticschristian apologeticsanthony rogers live streammuslim vs christian argumentsislam debate reaction

Anthony Rogers @Ousias1 will join Hatun to review a recent conversation between Daniel Haqiqatjou and Paul Williams, where Daniel appeared on Blogging Theolog

Anthony Rogers @Ousias1 will join Hatun to review a recent conversation between Daniel Haqiqatjou and Paul Williams, where Daniel appeared on Blogging Theology’s YouTube channel to review his debate with David Wood.
Daniel Haqiqatjou is known for openly supporting Sharia law — even to extreme lengths — and he took the platform against David Wood with the aim of finally debunking David Wood and the “Islamic dilemma” once and for all.
But what actually happened? The debate only made the Islamic dilemma stronger. Now, desperate to justify himself and claim victory, Daniel appears on the YouTube channel of a homosexual Muslim to present himself as the winner.
So, how do they twist the narrative to make it look like Daniel won the debate? And how do they attempt to turn the Islamic dilemma into a fake “Christian dilemma”?
Join Hatun and Anthony Rogers as they break it all down, expose the spin, and discuss what really happened.